Harriet Hall's "Critique" of Greger's "Uprooting the Leading Causes of Death"

Nice Rebuttal by Don Matesz

http://donmatesz.blogspot.com/2013/02/harriet-halls-critique-of-gregers.html

Primal Wisdom: Cherry Picking Data

Primal Wisdom: Cherry Picking Data: It seems that some people following low-carbohydrate diets believe that Dr. Michael Greger "cherry picked" the studies he cited in his ...

Here are a quote from this excellent Blog -

"All of these organizations make these recommendations in favor of eating more plants (carbohydrates) and less animal products (fat and protein) because, so far, we don't have any high quality data supporting the claim that low carbohydrate, flesh-based diets have similar effects to plant-based diets.  On the contrary, the preponderance of evidence, most of it produced by people who have not declared any commitment to animal rights, points in the direction of the conclusion that meat-based low carbohydrate diets promote the major causes of death." (Emphasis Added)

Source: http://donmatesz.blogspot.com/2013/02/cherry-picking-data.html

(Cherry Picking Data, Don Matesz, Web, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2013)
                                         

Gary Taubes - BIG FAT LIES

WATCHING DR. OZ MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH

http://www.plantpositive.com/blog/2013/1/26/watching-dr-oz-may-be-hazardous-to-your-health.html

Here are some quotes from the link -

"Typical of the low-carb promoters, they confuse the 1970 Seven Countries Study of Ancel Keys with his 1953 lecture and paper and completely mischaracterize both. Predictably, they blame heart disease on sugar and reimagine John Yudkin as a hero of diet-heart. Watch the three segments Dr. Oz handed over to these two and you’ll see he gave a full endorsement of their reckless, poorly researched, and biased claims, including the false assertion that large LDLs cannot contribute to atherosclerosis. (Emphasis Added)

"I am only one person but I’ve done a lot. I have provided all the evidence anyone needs to understand the truth about cholesterol. One can no longer claim that the science is too contradictory or confusing. Those with the most influence like Mehmet Oz need to educate themselves, accept reality, and stop harming people." (Emphasis Added)

Source: http://www.plantpositive.com/blog/2013/1/26/watching-dr-oz-may-be-hazardous-to-your-health.html

Food That Kills - Full Documentary

Fake Obesity Experts

I think the title of this video tells it all. Virtually all of my friends, that follow a High Fat/Low Carb diet, are chronically overweight.

In Defense Of Starch – Glucose isn’t the bad guy.

A very nice blog. She does a good job in debunking Gary Taubes.

http://mariamaestevens.com/2012/10/25/in-defense-of-starch-glucose-isnt-the-bad-guy/

Here's a quote from the link -

"But before I enter the scene of glucose metabolism, I’d like to breeze over a few of Taube’s conclusions, so you’ll get a feel for my incredulity:

• Dietary fat of any type is not a cause of obesity of metabolic syndrome.  I argue it is half-responsible.
• The problem is the carbohydrates in the diet due to their effect on insulin secretion.  The more easily digested the carb, the worse this effect is.  Not all carbs are created equal.  This is an unfair blanket statement.
  
• Sugars–sucrose and HFCS–are particularly harmful because the combo of fructose and glucose raises insulin and floods the liver with carbs.  This is more to the point, but a slight mis-statement.
• Through their direct effect on insulin and blood sugar, refined “fast carbs” are thedietary cause of metabolic syndrome–and the most likely cause of cancer, Alzheimer’s, and other chronic diseases of civilization.  Again, not all carbs are created equal.  Also, I doubt carbs cause cancer, but cellular fuel might reasonably help grow cancer.
• Obesity is a disorder of excess fat accumulation, not overeating or sedentary behavior (energy balance).  I beg to differ.  Ask any post-collegiate 20-something how much weight they gained after getting their first desk job.
• Consuming excess calories does not cause us to grow fatter.  Caloric deficits do not lead to long-term weight loss; it leads to hunger.  I can prove to you that consuming excess calories causes me to grow fatter.  Am I some kind of exception?
  
• Fattening and obesity are caused by an imbalance in the hormonal regulation of adipose tissue and fat metabolism.  I agree with this idea, but it is not a comprehensive cause of fattening.
• Insulin is the primary regulator of fat storage.  When insulin is high, we store fat.  When it falls, we release fat.  Agreed, mostly.  But this is contingent on energy balance and replete glycogen stores.
  
• By stimulating insulin secretion, carbs make us fat and ultimately cause obesity.  The fewer carbs we consume, the leaner we will be.  How do you account for whole foods vegans who follow diets of 10% fat?  They eat starch all day long and don’t get fat.
  
• By driving fat accumulation, carbs also increase hunger and decrease the amount of energy we expend in metabolism and physical activity.  There’s some backstory to this.  But carbs also contribute to satiety by raising blood sugar and elevating serotonin.
  

Wow.  That’s some list.   And my comments followed in bold.  So now let’s dig a little deeper by understanding different carbs."

Source: http://mariamaestevens.com/2012/10/25/in-defense-of-starch-glucose-isnt-the-bad-guy/

Good Calories, Bad Calories: A Critical Review (part 1)

This is one of the more impressive reviews of "Good calories, Bad Calories". This excellent blog debunks Gary Taubes research.

http://thescienceofnutrition.wordpress.com/2012/09/26/good-calories-bad-calories-a-critical-review/

Here's a quote from the link -

"Lies, Damned Lies, and Gary Taubes

I honestly did not expect to find near as many misleading quotes, misrepresentation of studies, or outright fabrication as I did in Good Calories, Bad Calories. I mean Taubes writes for The New York Times for Christ’s sake – arguably the most prestigious and most influential newspaper in the history of the world.

Nearly every single time I bothered to check a reference made in Good Calories, Bad Calories I found that Taubes had at best taken something out of context or at worst completely misrepresented a study. Not kidding. Here are a few examples beginning with the more anodyne." (Emphasis Added)

Source: http://thescienceofnutrition.wordpress.com/2012/09/26/good-calories-bad-calories-a-critical-review/

IS THIS THE RIGHT WAY TO EAT?

http://www.plantpositive.com/ 

Great Research. All videos come with transcripts. One of my absolute favorite websites on Nutrition.